Lyle Northey (Silent/Boomer)

It is 9/10 and the epic debate is scheduled for tonight. Will both parties show up, one will for sure the other we can’t say will or won’t as he tends to not be good at confrontations. We know that no matter the result he will claim victory or have excuses as to why he lost.
With all the baggage he is carrying the question is why is he even allowed to be there? One comment that was made about that was that it is an insult to the Vice President, the office for which this race is being run and the nation that a convicted felon is standing on the same stage. It was also stated that if he should win this election, hopefully not, that according to the Constitution he will not be able to serve. Don’t know if that is true, but would bet that the Supreme Court would find a way to subvert that clause.
We have so much to lose if Trump gets back in office. No amount of honest evaluation of the situation can possibly make that a plus scenario. The popular vote and the electoral vote have to be a win win in order for this to be accepted by all.
The outcome is hoped to be that Harris wins hands down. Once she is in office along with all the other items on the agenda, clearing or balancing the Supreme Court should be on the list. There are 2 of the justices that have been named to be impeached, and there are 3 more that should be added for perjury during their confirmation interviews. It is normal for people to have views that do not agree with everyone else’s but the attitude that your personal view is more important than the national view is extreme.
Over and over the views that are being put forward are based on someone’s religious beliefs, and that is the problem. When you are in a position that supposedly represents the majority then an individual attitude or belief needs to be shelved for the greater good. This is a realistic attitude for some to accept, and in other cases it is impossible as they believe that their individual views are the answer and all should follow. That is the current view of some in our society, notably the very wealthy, the very religious, and those with little or no tolerance for others.
What will this debate prove? When all is said and done it will prove nothing as the results will be tempered by how each observer views each of the candidates. The stage is open even if the mics are turned off for the non speaker this provides the opportunity to make comments and attempt to be distracting while off mic. The set should be two sound proof booths so you can hear the speaker but can not interrupt. That is a suggestion for any future debates.
Another suggestion put forward is to have Kamala start her segments with the comment, “That’s a lie”. Since whatever Trump has to say is most likely going to be a lie as he has little or no ability to tell the truth.
If the effort results in a bigger win for Kamala then it is worth it. For the good of the nation, and very possibly the world there can only be one winner and that is Kamala Harris.