Tho Dost Protest Too Much

Dwain Northey (Gen X)

Rep Ilhan Omar made a comment about how in her country pedophiles were executed the GOP and the Republicans outraged because they said she’s calling for Trump‘s execution.

In today’s political theater, guilt is no longer something established by courts, evidence, or even reality. It’s apparently determined by who yells the loudest, who clutches pearls the fastest, and who can transform a stray insult from a factory floor into a full-blown national morality play before lunchtime.

A shouted accusation becomes a viral clip. A crude response becomes a fundraising email. And within hours, entire cable news panels are debating not what actually happened, but what someone might have meant if interpreted through three layers of outrage and a generous helping of selective hearing. It’s less “law and order” and more improv comedy—except everyone insists the punchline is sacred truth.

Then comes the political alchemy: one person references harsh laws in another country, another group insists this must secretly apply to a political opponent, and suddenly the conversation isn’t about policy, governance, or anything remotely useful. Instead, we’re trapped in a logic puzzle where outrage proves innocence, denial proves persecution, and clarification somehow proves the original claim. If irony were electricity, the national grid would finally be stable.

Perhaps the real achievement here is bipartisan—both sides demonstrating that in modern politics, the fastest way to avoid discussing real problems is to sprint headfirst into the most ridiculous possible argument and plant a flag there. Infrastructure? Healthcare? The economy? Please. We’re busy decoding playground insults like they’re constitutional amendments.

And so the republic marches on, bravely protected from nuance, context, and adult conversation—because nothing says serious governance quite like a national debate that sounds suspiciously like recess supervision gone wrong.


Leave a comment