Esoteric Meandering Shouting Into the Void

Lyle Northey (Silent/Boomer)
Actions and acts speak volumes to everyone that sees or relates to each of us whether you are the baby that cries or the one that lasts. Everyone knows you by that action that carries through your school years, Class Clown, teacher’s pet or kid that no one wants to be around. It is all the image that we present to others as we mature through some Z society and what is normal and accepted behavior and complies with that image. Others rebel against everything, even things that are presented to protect or make you secure and the broader scope organizations do the same thing. They try be the VFW, American Legion, and even the k k k, each one of them has an image that they portray and they are either praised or vilified by that image. That concept carries over to Nations and countries and a few of each entity is presented to all and perceived as good or bad by all that are observing. We all are ambassador’s of our families, our communities or countries. We are further investors in the problems that we are having. These problems are made worse as no one is taking the time to understand that actions convey identity for all that can be identified as our clan, group, or organization. As ambassadors we need to be aware of and respectful to those we come in contact with professionally or casually for both sides of that issue or meeting. Skip all the other things that have been or could be said and go to the Golden Rule. We have suffered through the most Politically Incorrect person to ever fill office and many feel they are still justified in continuing to imitate him with hate language violent responses to situations and generally bad behavior at all times, perhaps we need to change what we should wear when we leave home that used to be clean underwear now it should be best behavior or body armor depending on which persona you wish to present.

Dwain Northey (Gen X)

Let’s go ahead and pick a fight with the monotheistic philosophy, I will leave Hinduism and Buddhism out of this particular rant because historically they do kill each other of questions of faith and believe that every living thing should be revered. Let’s stick to the monotheist factions.

If anyone has ever taken the time to delve into the Big 3, Judaism, Christianity, and Muslim otherwise known as the Islamic faith. All 3 have very similar tenants and all seem to recognize the same prophets, all recognize Noah, Moses, and Solomon as well as Jesus. The latest of the Big 3 the Islamic faiths with their prophetic leader Muhammad was an Arab religious, social, and political leader and the founder of Islam. According to Islamic doctrine, he was a prophet divinely inspired to preach and confirm the monotheistic teachings of Adam, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and other prophets. He is believed to be the Seal of the Prophets within Islam.

This is where my confusion starts 3 monotheistic faiths very similar doctrines same faith leaders but for centuries have been killing each other. Is this hostility over who is the “leader” or differing idea’s of heaven or paradise? Do thousands of people hate each other based on who the other professes to be their prophet or in the case of Christianity their savior? To me these seem like ridiculous reasons to war with anyone, but then again I feel that war in itself is a losing enterprise. War’s used to be about land and resources but since the introduction of the modern area the conflict reason has been anchored in faith.

Who has it right? To me that is a stupid question. All the afore mentioned teach that one should not steal, lie, cheat, murder… those are all good things, don’t see where the distrust comes from.

Live and let live if your prophet is Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, Bill the Cat, or no one that’s fine with me as long as you live by the rules of civil society.

I have been told that I won’t go to “Heaven” of I don’t believe because I am more agnostic than anything else… I don’t say that having some faith is bad I just don’t think in the broadest sense that we have a any idea what happens when we shake off this mortal coil.

My smart ass retort is usually that I am an Optimist: At the end either I am Right or I am Surprised and I am good with either option.   

Dwain Northey (Gen X)

Saw a bumper sticker this morning and it is one have seen many times but I am not sure if the person sporting it on their vehicle actually knows what their STICKER means.

The sticker (I HATE SOLICIALISM)

Here is a simple definition:

Socialism is a populist economic and political system based on collective, common, or public ownership of the means of production. Those means of production include the machinery, tools, and factories used to produce goods that aim to directly satisfy human needs.

Many see socialism and think communism and I can verify that because that is what a cashier at the grocery store said to me earlier today.

The main difference is that under communism, most property and economic resources are owned and controlled by the state (rather than individual citizens); under socialism, all citizens share equally in economic resources as allocated by a democratically-elected government.

We do not have either of these systems in the United States and no one not every Bernie Sanders is calling for a Socialist state. We do have social programs and our Constitution is in fact a social contract. If you read it the first three words are “We the People”. Hence, we are all in this together. Over the first nearly 250 years since the Declaration of Independence was signed, we haven’t always lived up to the WE part, as a collective there has always been an us and them but that’s not where I am going with this.

Our government has historically tired to unite, Lincoln with the Civil War, Theodore Roosevelt did his best to bring the dream of prosperity to the masses and even the playing field form the robber barrens of the late 19^th and early 20^th centuries, FDR brought the nation out of the depression and created a social safety net so seniors didn’t live in squaller in their golden years. These were all huge investments paid for by all to provide for all, although the ones that need it most also pay the lions share.

Social Security and Medicare are deduction that come out of every working persons pay and are in turn distributed to recipients who also paid into the system. It is not a discretionary line item in the budget or an entitlement, it is a paid benefit.

Let’s put this into a scenario everyone can understand. Let’s say you worked for the same company your entire working life . For your years of service  you had a contract with said company that they took a small part of your check every pay period that when you retire would provide for you for the rest of your life. That would be a pretty good deal, right? Well, that is what Social Security is. Now let’s imagine that said company decides that they want to dissolve that contract but they still want to hold onto your money but they will invest it in the market so that their friends can make more money (hopefully) and they “promise” that you will still get your money back (Hopefully).

Sounds like a great plan a guarantee to hopefully. That is the plan this current republican party is selling.

They brought a measure to the floor denouncing Socialism… what do they historically define a Socialism.

• Social Security
• Medicare
• Public School
• The Post Office
• National Parks

I could continue the list, but you see my point.

In their system the rich get to exploit and get richer and the rest are left with HOPEFULLY.

Dwain Northey (Gen X)

Prior to 1967 in the state of California carrying a gun was nearly a main stay just like modern day Texas until the Black Panthers showed up on the steps of the State House armed when they heard about the proposed Mumford Act and would ban the carrying of a firearm in public. They took this as the Conservative Government trying to disarm their primarily black organization and being a good Republican the Governor Ronald Reagan of course squelched that gun control act. Oh no he didn’t … a gang of angry (not white) men had come to the State House armed the law banning and making carrying a firearm in public without a license a federal offence.

That’s right the Republican Savior banned guns in California. The statement at the time said it had nothing to do with a group of armed black men showing up at the Capitol but anyone with eyes knew different.

Today the Republicans with the NRA want everyone to have a gun no matter how young… really I seriously doubt that if a large group of any minority group showed up on the steps of congress you can bet there would be some gun control measures enacted. If the January 6 had actually been BLM there would be gun control laws not to mention many protesters having been shot and killed by the authorities.

This is the hypocrisy of the current GOP. The house last week passed a resolution to remove all the metal detectors and allow members to carry a firearm into the house chamber and meeting rooms. Understandably some democratic members feel endangered by this action having been threatened by other house members in the recent past.

I say call them out… Minority Leader Jeffries have your entire caucus show up in full tactical gear and armed. Anyone else think the rule would be change because the big tough GOP would feel threatened, I can guarantee that.  

Dwain Northey (Gen X)

I am disheartened by the news and our apparent inability to control some in our societies basest instinct. Mass shooting have become a daily occurrence to date in 2023 our nation has had more mass shooting that days on the current calendar, according to the Washington Post as of January 24 there were 39 mass shooting in the United States. (Mass shooting is defined as 4 or more injured and/or killed.) What happened to arguments that resulted with a fist fight at worst or just walking away, now a disagreement has to be solved with gun fire. We have more gun deaths per capita than some war zones and we still proport the U.S. to be a “safe” society.

In 1983 the movie a Christmas Story came out that depicted a family from the 40’s, the son, Ralphie wanted a Red Rider Air Rifle. What did every character in the movie say to him? “You’ll put your eye out with that kid!!” That was talking about an air rifle, I read that there is a company called Wee Tactical that is going to produce a .22 caliber rifle called a Jr15 that is exactly the same style as an AR15 only 20% smaller to fit more comfortably in a child’s hands.

This makes me absolutely sick to my stomach… Even the designer of the AR assault style rifle has said that it has no practical purpose outside of a war zone, and now there is a company that is specifically designing a war machine for kids.

The 2^nd Amendment that all gun lovers spout gives them a right to have any gun they want obviously have never read the entire amendment. Here it is for those who haven’t read the whole thing.

Second Amendment

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

It is painfully obvious that the first 4 words of the amendment are completely ignored by those who only repeat the last 14 words in this very short amendment.

I read this as every person has the right to join the National Guard, a well-regulated militia, to ensure the security of their Free State. Not that every jack-ass with an apposable thumb has the right to own any projectile throwing machine they want. If you want to play BANG-BANG join the military where you can be trained or go to a firing range where it is safe with trained individuals.

I have the Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness and so do my children and friends. Do you really believe that my right to life is an affront to your right to have a firearm? Because I know that your “right” to have a firearm can be a detriment to my Right to Life.  

Lyle Northey (Silent/Boomer)

  Read an article in the paper about the “innocent patriots’ ‘ that tried to overthrow a legal election and are now being held in jail that is so terrible they would like to be sent to the one in Cuba because the conditions are better there. 

   The inmates in that prison have a great deal in common with these “patriots”, they hate America as it stands and what it stands for, but somehow I do not believe that they would welcome these “patriots”. The similarities are great, they preach and practice hatred, and wish death to all that do not believe. They are fanatical about their devotion to a leader that uses every method he can think of to have them do the dirty work without getting shit all over his shoes. Thinking is not allowed; it would interfere with the leader’s vision of a world devoted to him, run by him, and destroyed to make him wealthier.

    Many great things once came from the place that the men held in Cuba come from, and that all went away because of one man’s obsession with how he thought the world should work and it was based on religion. Many great things have come from the US but we too are falling from a leader position to one dominated by someone that believes he is greater than all before him and that he should be followed without question. Education and intelligent thought are enemies to such people that follow these kinds of leaders. 

   The practices of school yard bullies should be left behind with the adolescent age, growth should happen in the mind as well as the body. Differences are the interesting stimuli of life; they should not be the basis for hate and embitterment. 

    It may be that we are where we are as a nation because we have allowed the fringe of society to make enough noise that we have lost sight of what we are or should be. We have had multiple disagreements over the course of your history and we have managed to get past those issues without resorting to internal warfare except for the Civil War. One of those has been called to satisfy one’s man’s ego and our current issue with a stolen election is not a reason for war. At most it may be a valid discussion point but that is doubtful.

    Giving the people that caused 5 deaths in their peaceful quest to overthrow an election a pass on any type of punishment will not be productive. Should it be jail time, or taking away their citizenship, or their property, forcing them to leave the country, making them wear a badge to mark them as was done in the book “The Scarlet Letter” or as Hitler did to the Jews? 

    Perhaps we should take lessons from the part of the world that believes in eyes being removed, or tongues cut out, or other parts being cut off, stoned to death or thrown out of aircraft, what should it be? The idea that life would be better elsewhere is short sighted on the part of the people complaining about their current, self inflicted predicament and rather than point at the guards, the system, or the local courts they should be directing their anger at the image in the mirror and the man on the podium.

Dwain Northey (Gen X)

I am astounded that the Republican Party continues to call themselves the Party of  Lincoln. Yes, he was technically the first of the Republican Party but prior to Lincoln this was the Whig party more a federalist party the competing party was the Democratic Republican Party that had North and South contingents, both of which had their own ideas about slavery and its expansion. Lincoln’s VP in 1864 was Andrew Johnson who was a Tennessee Democratic Republican who had stayed silent during the being of the Civil War and in my opinion the current Republican party more represents.

There are many obvious contradictions in the current Republican and the man they espouse to be steadfastly following.

• Lincoln wanted to maintain the Union and went to war to do just that.
  • Current Republicans seem to want to dissolve the Union.
• Lincoln proclaimed in his Gettysburg Address that line from the Constitution “that All Men are Created Equal” and by all accounts he meant it.
  • Can’t say that for the current party membership.
    • Voting down equal voting rights
    • Gerrymandering districts so that people of color are underrepresented.
• Lincoln instituted the first Federal income tax and the original IRS to fund the Civil War with a progressive tax.
  • Current House of Representatives under slim Republican majority first bill to the floor was to abolish the IRS and institute a 30% federal sales tax.
    • Am I the only one that thinks that is regressive and would destroy our economy?

I am sure that very few republicans today knew that the income tax was “their guys” doing. Well, I have news for you it was. 

The current Republican Party still spouts the sentiments that Ronald Reagan stated while he was sitting in the White House, “ What is the biggest lie spoken (We am here from the government and here to help.)” Their new motto may as well be, “Government is broken, elect ME and I will prove it.”

I don’t know why some run for public office that have zero faith that the institution works and have no intention on fixing what they say is broken. The only rationale I can come up with is celebrity and power and that isn’t no reason to seek public office.

So I say lets stop calling this batch of Republicrats Lincolns Party and call them what they are the Destruction or Dismantlement Party. They are not America First as they proclaim they are in it for themselves and the moneyed interests that fill their coffers.   

Lyle Northey (Silent/Boomer)

  There is an ad on Canadian TV about a young man that is half White and half Native and how it is being caught in the middle. He feels that neither race is very concerned or caring about his situation, and he may be right as that is often the case in mixed race people. Rather than looking at it as being and outsider he would do much better to celebrate his difference and challenge the ones that are not mixed to reconsider their position.

  Native peoples in the America’s, and I suspect, all over the world have made a practice of claiming the high ground for their particular tribe. This in turn causes tribes to fight one another and one of the side effects of the fighting is usually the taking of women and children by one tribe to the other. Those others are so bad or whatever and yet they are good to raise as ours and great breeding stock to keep us from becoming idiots from inbreeding even if they did not know a thing about such possibilities. 

   White or black or brown or red all have done the same thing whether it be to take from an enemy or to create another slave that has been the way of the world. The problem is compounded by the bias of racial superiority and the resulting violence that comes from that bias. If we were not all human then the interbreeding would not be possible. 

  The tribal attitude is what brings about nations and all the nonsense that goes with that. Everyone has a little different outlook on almost every aspect of life and like mindedness is one of the things that create nations. We draw lines or put up walls or whatever to keep them out and then set up rules so that if one or two decide that the way of life in one place doesn’t suit we are able to move to another country and get on with our lives. Some of those rules are there to make sure no one comes to our country unless they have a skill we need or lots of money.

   The people that advocate the harsher rules should all be subject to screening to see if they would be able to cross the border if they were trying to enter the country.

These first few post are very random and appear to have little continuity, hence meandering. We are still finding our footing and this page may be more a stream of consciousness blog for awhile. Appreciate any input or discussion on anything posted so far.

Thank you, Dwain Northey (Gen X)

Author Lyle Northey (Silent/Boomer 1945)

The focus of so many that claim to be the righteous and the messengers or enforcers of God forget that our Constitution does not identify this nation as having only one God. The line is “Endowed by their Creator” not God. Let us again be a nation that welcomes all who seek freedom and that includes the freedom of domination by any group or organization that runs around spouting isms from a book written by men for men with a complete disregard for anyone else’s view save their own. The separation of church and state was not an accident. Our founders had seen the results of church states and they were determined not to make this country another victim of religious dictates. Roe vs Wade, gender issues, racial issues, the use of medications or science in treatments are all issues that religious groups have problems with and those problems are magnified when devotees are given the power to make the decisions for the rest of us. We have adopted the habit of swearing in someone with one hand on the Bible and yet if that person is not of that faith or does not believe in a higher being does it mean anything and if they do not tell the truth can you justly punish them? At present our higher beings are people that consider themselves as Gods and have no problem with shaping the nation as they see fit, those included are members of the Supreme Court, former President, and a good number of Governors of various states. Time to cut off Medusa’s heads and get back to common sense and the good of the majority not the minority.