Thirteen stripes on the U.S. flag mean 13 colonies originally rebelled against British rule in 1775, right? Strangely, this too is also a myth of sorts. While it’s true that the former British colonies did begin the American Revolution in earnest in 1775 with the Battles of Lexington and Concord, there were technically only 12 colonies at the time. Although it had its own legislative assembly since 1704, the little stretch of coast known today as Delaware was then a part of the Pennsylvania Colony. Delaware didn’t declare its independence until June 15, 1776 — just in time to send delegates to the Second Continental Congress to vote on the Declaration of Independence less than a month later. Although Delaware was the last colony to fully form in America’s colonial period, it certainly wasted no time ushering in the new era, as the state was the very first to ratify the U.S. Constitution on December 7, 1787, technically making it the first U.S. state in the union.
No Member of the Military Will Ever Outrank George Washington
Credit: Three Lions via Getty Images
While every acting President serves as the commander in chief of the U.S. military, nobody will ever outrank George Washington. He was posthumously given the rank of General of the Armies of the United States, sometimes compared to being a six-star general. Although General John J. Pershing also held the title for his service during WWI, when President Ford appointed Washington in 1976 — 200 years after Washington’s heyday — he specified that our first President would always rank first among all Army officers past and present.
What does “having it all” mean to you? Is it attainable?
I suppose just being satisfied with what you have or where you are in life is a broad definition of having it all. But satisfaction and complacency are two different things. I was married with a child and thought I had it all now I’m divorced and don’t know that a relationship is ever going to be in my future, but it doesn’t define the fact my acknowledging that being alone mean that in some way I can’t be satisfied with where I am.
In the first century BCE, Rome’s calendar was a mess. The timekeeping system was first instituted around 700 BCE (back when Rome had kings), and from the start, the calendar had some issues. The year was 355 days long with an extra month added at the discretion of the pontifices, high-ranking priests who were in charge of the calendar. As the system was imprecise and subject to mismanagement, over time the calendar became misaligned with the seasons. What’s more, pontifices often abused their power by lengthening the terms of their allies and curtailing them for adversaries.
When Julius Caesar became dictator of Rome in 49 BCE, he decided a change was in order, both to limit the pontifices’ power and to create a more effective calendar for administering a growing empire. With the help of Greek astronomer Sosigenes of Alexandria, Caesar instituted the eponymous Julian calendar on January 1, 45 BCE. But to make the switch to the new calendar, Romans had to withstand what’s now known as the “last year of confusion.” At this point, Rome’s calendar was roughly three months out of whack with the seasonal harvest festivals, so Caesar inserted three extra months into the year 46 BCE, known as “intercalary months,” to get his 365-day calendar realigned with the solar year. For those living within Rome’s borders, 46 BCE — at 445 days long — became the longest year in history.
I’m confused is this person you want to speak to alive or dead or is it they’re just not close to you. If you really want to talk to them soon and they are among the living then you have multiple avenues to contact them via cell phone Skype, regular landline phone, so I’m confused by the question.
Saw a piece on Tom Harman this morning where they were talking about the decline in intelligence scores on tests since about 2008. The last few years prove that it is not limited to the US but is a worldwide issue, everyone seems to be getting dumber. Stupidity is the only way to justify the crap we are seeing in the people that are being voted into high office.
Every country in the world seems to have a share of stupids that are entrusted with making decisions for the citizens of the various nations and most of these people cannot make a decision as to what to have for breakfast, IHop, McDonalds or road kill. We are having the ignorance effort pushed to the limit with book banning and burning, the demands of misguided political people trying to establish school curriculum based on their faith or opinion.
Schools are being closed because of a lack of teachers. When too many involve themselves in places they should stay out of things do not get better. The guidance to educators should be established before classes begin and then let the teachers run with it. Coming in with new requirements in the middle of a year is not productive.
What is written here is an opinion and yes I am aware that opinions are like a–holes, everyone has one and from time to time they all stink. That being said, keep in mind that education is the one commodity that keeps one ahead of another and we as a nation do not need to be in the trailing category when it comes to education. Just because a word or phrase from the past may upset a small number of people that should not make it a target to eliminate an entire book or portion of historical knowledge from school curriculum.
The language of yesterday may seem crude today but it is no more offensive than some of the language we hear today and at some point what we use as common verbiage may be totally offensive to the generation of tomorrow. Knowing the terminology of the past may give you a leg up someday if only to solve a crossword puzzle.
The ignorance that is prevalent is very much in evidence when we have so many people in positions of power that seem to be illiterate on multiply levels. They cannot write and make sense, they cannot speak without profanity or complete lack of knowing which word to say to convey a message properly, and they cannot answer questions that have not been rehearsed. Moral codes do not exist for these people, it is take as much as you can and turn down no offer if it enriches your bank account even if it destroys your country.
The U.S. Supreme Court was established by the Judiciary Act of 1789, creating the third coequal branch of government and a high court to which all others are inferior. Notably missing from that federal statute: any stipulation that the highest court in the land should have nine justices. In fact, the bench has ranged from as few as five to as many as 10 justices over the last two and a half centuries. As you might expect, the process by which that number has changed hasn’t exactly been apolitical. The Supreme Court had six justices when George Washington signed the act into law on September 24, 1789, and that was almost reduced to five in 1801 before being increased to seven in 1807 — two changes that were motivated by legislators hoping to either weaken or strengthen the President’s power to appoint judges.
After that, SCOTUS was comprised of seven justices for three decades before being expanded in 1837, allowing President Andrew Jackson to add two more people to the bench. Its membership then increased by one during the Civil War to ensure that majority decisions would be written by justices who were pro-Union and anti-slavery, before being restored to the current number, nine, after Ulysses S. Grant was elected President in 1868. Court expansion has been a hot topic at several points since, most notably when Franklin D. Roosevelt tried and failed to expand the Supreme Court as part of the New Deal.
We have a political party that have deified a malignant narcissist, who takes full credit for having taken rights away from women that they had for more than 50 years. My honest question is if this wanna be authoritarian dictator gets back into office and his sycophants get their way what rights will be gone next ? Will he get more justices on the Supreme Court and the Oberafeld decision be reversed so same sex unions will once again be unrecognized, will the Loving decision be reversed outlawing interracial marriages. Just how far back in time will the ‘So called’ religious right want to take us? Slavery and child labor would absolutely be on the table in a corporate autocracy where profits are the only thing that matters.
I don’t know about you but I have no desire to go back to a world a small group of men can tell everyone what they can and can’t do and pull every string.
I don’t own anything that has any significant value as far as heirlooms or anything like that. I did hold onto my wedding ring, even 10 years after being divorced, but recently lost it and realized it was just an object that really had no significant value.
You must be logged in to post a comment.