Dwain Northey (Gen X)
In1563, the Council of Trent launched the ‘Fig Leaf Campaign’ to camouflage the penises and public hair visible in art across Italy. The cover-up choice was a ‘Fig Leaf’.
Until the 1400s, Romans were traditionally inspired by Greek art. The ancient marble sculptures were chiseled with a nude body and that represented honor and virtue. The naked idols symbolized purity.
But in the 1500s, the acts of art censorship began when the Counter-Reformation took over the Vatican and started portraying nudity as immodest and obscene.
The Roman Catholic Church initiated the censorship campaign with Michel Angelo’s David. Powerful clergymen wanted to clothe the nude David.
It is the 21st century and somehow, we have reverted back to the puritanic virtue of the 16th century. As a society we flow back and forth with this insane love and hatred of the human body. Attorney General Ashcroft had the bare breast of bronze statues in the capitol complex covered because they offended is puritan prudish principles. Headlines read, “No longer will the attorney general be photographed in front of two partially nude statues in the Great Hall of the Department of Headline As a consequence, the department of justice spent $8,000 on blue drapes that hide the two giant, aluminum art deco statues.
Now a Principle in Florida (of course Florida) has been fired for allowing the image of Michel Angelo’s David to be used in an art class. Deemed by the holier than thou parents as pornographic. These are most likely the same parents that go to church that displays a cross with a half nude image of a man being tortured via crucifixion. Some would call that voyeuristic, ghoulish and pornographic and not something that should be displayed in the public venue.
There is more graphic nudity in movies and online that children see every day, but the image of male genitals is just a bridge to far for some. I might agree if the statue of David had an erect penis, but it doesn’t. That fact that the statue and images of it have been seen by millions and for centuries and has been taught in art classes for nearly as long is also a head scratcher.
Art educators should be deeply concerned over efforts at any kind of suppression of works of art. Freedom of expression is guaranteed by the Constitution. This freedom of expression includes both verbal expression—speech and writing; and non-verbal expression, which includes the “language” of the various arts.
Free communication is essential to the preservation of a free society and a creative culture. Now, as always in our history, artworks—literature, theatre, painting, sculpture, music, and dance are among our most effective instruments of freedom. They are powerful means for making available ideas, feelings, social growth, the envisioning of new possibilities for humankind, solutions to problems, and the improvement of human life.
I believe the whole point is that suppression of ideas and of artistic expression leads to conformity, the limiting of diversity of expression to a narrow range of “acceptable” forms, and the stifling of freedom. We don’t want a generation that thinks for themselves, we don’t teach critical thinking, our primary educators are trained to teach only what is being tested. It would be tragic if we had a new generation of thinkers and leaders.
So the 21st century Fig Leaf campaign has begun and we will all be lesser for it.