In addition to having one of the most remarkable post-White House lives of any president, Jimmy Carter had one of the most interesting trajectories toward the Oval Office. That includes not only being a peanut farmer but also reporting seeing a UFO in 1973, at which time he was governor of Georgia and three years away from being elected to the nation’s highest office. The actual sighting took place in 1969, while Carter was visiting the Lions Club in Leary, Georgia. In his report, he wrote that “a kind of green light appeared in the western sky. This was right after sundown. It got brighter and brighter. And then it eventually disappeared. It didn’t have any solid substance to it, it was just a very peculiar looking light. None of us could understand what it was.”
An amateur astronomer with a strong knowledge of physics stemming from his time in the U.S. Navy’s nuclear submarine program, Carter insisted that what he saw wasn’t Venus, as some skeptics suggested, and that 10 to 12 others witnessed it as well. He also vowed to encourage the government to release “every piece of information” about UFOs to the public if he were to become president, though he ultimately opted not to do so for fear that the information could have “defense implications” that might risk national security.
The plan for how to run the country if Trump is re-elected, 2025, is a total disaster for the majority of us. The control of everything including health matters, the removal of anything that looks like a benefit, handout to the republicans, will be done away with. The people behind this massive rape of the country are the ultra wealthy that got where they are because this country provided them the opportunity to become rich. Now they want to deny that opportunity to anyone and everyone else. They are supposedly all good christians, church goers and people of good moral conscience and yet they have collectively written a manifesto of ideas that speaks of control and punishment. Watch your neighbor, spy on their every move and report back if you believe they are doing things that are not approved, you will be rewarded. The places you better not watch and report on are the houses of the rich, they can do no wrong. Extreme ego and a feeling of self righteousness are driving this train. There is no reason for public support like social security, we the wealthy have plenty to take care of ourselves, you should have saved and you would have enough as well. Oh, you say you worked in my factory for 50 years and were never paid enough to have savings, well then die and reduce the surplus population. Sounds a bit like the Scrooge tale. These upstanding citizens want to turn the clock back at least a couple of hundred years. They do not want women to vote or have a voice in decisions especially when it comes to personal health and childbirth. They would like to readopt slavery and do away with voting rights for all but the very wealthy and of course you must be white. The campaign from the republican side has again descended into the calling of names and lies upon lies to convince everyone that their opponents are unfit, untrustworthy and just totally corrupt. This is the view they have looking in the mirror so why should it not be what they see looking at others. The burning question that is not being asked has to be Why did you as a party nominate a 34 count convicted criminal to represent you? This man put the country further in debt in one term than collectively all the administration in the previous 50 years had done. He lies to all of us and yet your party persists in their worship of him. He has already called for violence if he loses again. He has stated that if he wins this time around he will fix it so you never have to vote again and all will be good. He will have set up his empire and will expect that his sons will follow him as dictator forever, as long as they are Trump. If that future comes to be then all of you devoutly religious people will have nothing left but to sit on your butts and pray for assistance and read your book of fiction that was written by men that were just as screwed up and stupid as the one you electe
Things are looking positive Harris is a strong candidate for the White House even though Biden was and is still doing a stellar job as President. My warning is don’t get complacent, we assumed that the malignant narcists would not beat Clinton in 2016 but we all know what happened.
In 2016-2018-2020 the GOP didn’t have a defined plan, well at least not one that they had publicized but now they do and their blueprint is the demise of democracy, so in that vein I and going to post pieces of the 2025 Project so that maybe some of us will realize the threat is real.
How would Project 2025 impact troops and veterans?
Spencer Chretien, left, and Kristen Eichamer stand in the Project 2025 tent during the playing of the national anthem at the Iowa State Fair, Aug. 14, 2023, in Des Moines, Iowa. (Charlie Neibergall/AP)
Banning transgender troops from service, revoking the VA’s ability to provide abortion-related care and slashing the number of general officers in the ranks are just a few of the policy proposals laid out in a political playbook for what the next Republican administration could look like.
Known as Project 2025, the plan organizedby the conservative think thank The Heritage Foundation would make sizable changes to the lives of service members and veterans if implemented.
The lengthy guidebook that seeks to reform several facets of the federal government has taken the spotlight in the 2024 presidential race.
While Republican nominee and former President Donald Trump has distanced himself from Project 2025, Democrats have called the agenda a “dangerous blueprint” for what his second term could look like.
Project 2025 was authored by many officials who served in the first Trump administration.
“I know nothing about Project 2025,” Trump said in July on Truth Social. “I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.”
But Democrats are not ready to let him off the hook yet. Vice President Kamala Harris, who received an endorsement from President Joe Biden to serve as the next commander-in-chief after he dropped out from the presidential election this past weekend, warned in a social media video that Trump and his team intend to implement Project 2025.
What exactly is Project 2025?
The Project 2025 initiative includes a roughly 900-page policy agenda, a personnel database for those who could serve in the next Republican administration, a training for those individuals called the “Presidential Administration Academy” and also plans for a playbook of actions to be taken in the first 180 days of office.
The effort includes recommendations by former Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller, and has been led by other former Trump administration officials including Paul Dans, former chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management, and Spencer Chretien, former special assistant to the president and associate director of presidential personnel.
Policy recommendations stretch across the executive branch, from the White House to the Department of Justice to independent regulatory agencies, each broadly seeking to reduce the size and scope of the federal government.
“Our goal is to assemble an army of aligned, vetted, trained, and prepared conservatives to go to work on Day One to deconstruct the Administrative State,” a prelude to the handbook states.
The “administrative state” refers to executive branch agencies exercising the power to create, enforce and adjudicate their own rules. Those who oppose such a setup, primarily Republicans, argue that unelected officials should not have such powers.
How would Project 2025 impact troops?
The policy chapter on remaking the Department of Defense includes reducing the number of generals and reinstituting policies barring transgender individuals from serving in the military.
“Our disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, our impossibly muddled China strategy, the growing involvement of senior military officers in the political arena, and deep confusion about the purpose of our military are clear signals of a disturbing decay and markers of a dangerous decline in our nation’s capabilities and will,” Miller wrote.
Some of the suggested personnel changes Miller put forth fall in line with conservative culture war arguments, including:
Eliminating “Marxist indoctrination and divisive critical race theory programs,” which the text does not provide examples of.
Other prescriptions include:
Suspending the use of the recently introduced Military Health System Genesis, where military applicants are medically examined before they can sign up.
Requiring completion of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, the military entrance examination, by all students in schools that receive federal funding.
Increasing the Army force structure by 50,000.
Aligning the Marine Corps’ combat arms rank structure with the Army’s.
Maintaining between 28 and 31 larger amphibious warships as opposed to the what is specified in current Navy shipbuilding plans.
Ken Cuccinelli, a former DHS official from the Trump administration, who wrote that section of the guidebook, said the maritime service should instead be moved to the Department of Justice when not at war, or alternatively to DOD for all purposes.
The policy chapter on reforming the Department of Veterans Affairs involves rescinding VA’s ability to provide abortion services and revising hybrid and remote work options for the department’s employees.
“The VA must continually strive to be recognized as a ‘best in class,’ ‘Veteran-centric’ system with an organizational ethos inspired by and accountable to the needs and problems of veterans, not subservient to the parochial preferences of a bureaucracy,” Tucker said.
Reviewing in-person work options. Tucker cited that, specifically for VA staff in the nation’s capital, the remote work policy is “undermining the cohesiveness and competencies of some staff functions and diluting general organizational accountability and responsiveness.”
Requiring Veterans Health Administration facilities to increase the number of patients seen each day to equal the number seen by DOD medical facilities: approximately 19 patients per provider per day. Currently, Tucker said, VA facilities may be seeing as few as six patients per provider per day.
Not everyone however agreed with taking that approach.
“VHA healthcare providers need to spend more time with veterans during their appointments to effectively address their complex health needs,” Russell Lemle and Jasper Craven, from the Veterans Healthcare Policy Institute, wrote in a Task & Purpose op-ed. “By demanding that VHA facilities match the patient volume at DOD facilities, Project 2025 risks shortchanging veterans and compromising the quality of care they receive by treating them as if they are in the prime of their youth,” they added.
Other recommendations from Tucker included:
Embracing the expansion of Community Based Outpatient Clinics without “investing further in obsolete and unaffordable VA health care campuses.”
Revising disability rating awards for future claimants while “preserving them fully or partially for existing claimants.”
Establishing a veterans “bill of rights” so vets and VA staff know exactly what benefits veterans are entitled to receive.
Transferring all career Senior Executive Service individuals out of specific positions on the first day to “ensure political control of the VA.”
Michael Embrich, a former member of the Advisory Committee on the Readjustment of Veterans, shared in an op-ed for GovExec that following Project 2025′s plans to reshape the government workforce “would disproportionately affect veterans, many of whom rely on these positions not only for employment but also for a sense of purpose and community.”
Abraham Lincoln’s assassination is one of America’s defining historical events, and the trauma lasted long after his death. Our 16th — and, according to many rankings, best — President is the White House’s most famous ghost, having been sighted more than any other spirit. In a way, those sightings include a chilling prophecy Lincoln experienced himself. One evening early in 1865, Lincoln told his close friend Ward Hill Lamon of a troubling dream he’d had a week and a half earlier:
“I soon began to dream. There seemed to be a deathlike stillness about me. Then I heard subdued sobs, as if a number of people were weeping. I thought I left my bed and wandered downstairs … I arrived at the East Room. Before me was a catafalque [raised platform for a coffin], on which rested a corpse wrapped in funeral vestments. Around it were stationed soldiers who were acting as guards; and there was a throng of people, some gazing mournfully upon the corpse, whose face covered, others weeping pitifully. ‘Who is dead in the White House?’ I demanded of one of the soldiers. ‘The President,’ was his answer. ‘He was killed by an assassin.’”
Lincoln was assassinated just a few months later, and sightings of the fallen leader in the room now known as the Lincoln Bedroom began not long after. According to Jared Broach, founder of the ghost tour company Nightly Spirits, “They say Lincoln always comes back whenever he feels the country is in need or in peril. They say he just strides up and down the second-floor hallways and raps on doors and stands by windows.”
It isn’t just humans who have felt this presence. Rex Scouten, then the White House curator, said in 1989 that Ronald Reagan’s dog felt comfortable roaming through every room in the White House except the Lincoln Bedroom, where “he’d just stand outside the door and bark.”
No less a credible source than Winston Churchill himself reported encountering Lincoln’s ghost in that very room, albeit under different circumstances. He had just stepped out of the bath and was “wearing” nothing but a cigar when he saw the former President by the fireplace. “Good evening, Mr. President,” Churchill reportedly said. “You seem to have me at a disadvantage.” Indeed he did, but it’s hard to imagine anyone else being so witty in that moment.
We have a new candidate on the ticket, or at least that is how it looks, the nomination has not happened yet. That being said and with good fortune it is likely that the popular vote will go with this candidate. What do we do with the electoral college? This is a band of bought and paid for individuals that tend to elect rich white men.
This is not the year for them to make the choice for the rest of us. That could mean another 4 years or longer of an inept individual that has no business being President. It in turn would mean Project 2025 would be implemented and we do not need that.
The very thought of having this group that is selected out of gerrymandered districts that vote only one way is unacceptable. A request should be made to the President that the electoral college be disbanded immediately. The purpose in the beginning was to offset the lack of education of those allowed to vote in favor of the rich white property owners who obviously knew best what was good for the country. Does that sound biased?
Granted the republican party with their book banning and burning and the censure on what can or cannot be taught. They may again bring our nation to the point of illiteracy that was common in 1790 but for the present it has not.
The populations of the world have for far too long been at the mercy of a few that claim to know what is best for all. It happens with wealth and it happens with religion. The idea that all the answers are in the rich man’s spreadsheet or the book of stories that should not be viewed as more than stories. The stories were written by men as they tend to elevate men and suppress women. They are also very harsh in the treatment of those that are considered not to be of equal status. Another example of men being the authors is the use of defamatory language to describe others. If you were God would you call your daughter a whore?
Others are concerned with this outdated process and have started a campaign to get rid of it. We are at a point in our history where it is important that all of us take an interest in our collective future. The idea that someone else is going to do it just does not work. Believing that someone will clean it up does not pick up the trash along our highways nor does it clean up the mess that misguided or corrupt public officials create.
Our nation’s capital is a very grand looking place, it also reminds one of a place that can hide a lot of stuff from view. The new German parliament buildings are built with lots of glass and places for the public to watch and listen to what is going on in the chamber. We need more open relations with our government and we need to be able to interrupt them when they get off the course of what they have been elected to do, which is not to find fault with the other party. They are supposed to be there to resolve differences, not make mountains out of mole hills.
The other issue of greater concern is that more youth need to take part in the process as they are the ones that will ultimately have to pay the bills of tomorrow so they should have a say in what is being spent today. We can only guess at what those changes will ultimately look like but with planning and compassion for our fellow humans it is possible to make everyone comfortable. As we age most of us realize that great wealth and fame are not to be ours. So like the song from My Fair Lady, “All I want is a room somewhere far away from the cold night”. Everyone should have at least that much not to die in a tent under an overpass or worse.
The point is that Trump and Project 2025 is almost a guarantee of many being under the overpass while a very select few will enjoy the warmth of lavish accommodations at the expense of the majority of society.
History note that there have only been 10 VPs to serve as President but that is is incorrect, there there have only been 10 Vice Presidents that became President after following the initial term as VP. We do need to recognize that President Biden was a very successful VP under the First Black President Barack Obama it is only fitting that the First Black Female VP could be the next sitting President.
In the United States presidential line of succession, it falls to the Vice President to succeed to the presidency if their predecessor is no longer able to carry out the duties of the office. This has happened ten times in the history of the country, under a wide variety of circumstances. Some Vice Presidents, such as Calvin Coolidge, succeeded to the top spot during a time of relative peace and economic prosperity. Others, such as Harry Truman, were appointed to the office in a climate of war and political turmoil. Vice Presidents only inherit the presidency under unusual circumstances, and each instance is unique. Here are nine facts about the U.S. Vice Presidents who have succeeded to the presidency.
Advertisement
Photo credit: GraphicaArtis/ Archive Photos via Getty Images
John Tyler Was Nicknamed “His Accidency”
John Tyler was elected Vice President in 1840 as the running mate of William Henry Harrison. Unfortunately, Harrison’s administration did not last long: The President died in 1841 just 31 days after taking office, which meant Tyler quickly found himself the nation’s commander in chief. Tyler’s presidency was marked by tension with his own Whig Party. He vetoed bills proposed by Whig leaders in Congress and began to advocate for policies that broke with the Whig Party line. As a result, the Whigs expelled President Tyler from their party, and some even called for his impeachment on the grounds that he had abused his veto power. To further disparage Tyler, his political critics saddled him with the nickname “His Accidency,” a pejorative reference to the fact that he had become President through chance, and was never elected to the office.
Photo credit: Heritage Images/ Hulton Archive via Getty Images
Millard Fillmore Was the Last President Who Was Not a Democrat or a Republican
When Vice President Millard Fillmore ascended to the presidency in 1850, after his predecessor Zachary Taylor died following a mysterious illness, he did so as a member of the Whig Party, which was founded in 1830 to oppose the policies of then-President Andrew Jackson, a Democrat. President Fillmore proved to be the last Whig Party member to become President of the United States. The party largely disbanded a year after his administration ended in 1853, with many of its anti-slavery members branching off to form the Republican Party. In fact, Fillmore was the last U.S. President to belong to neither of the two major parties that continue to dominate American politics today. Fillmore’s successor, Franklin Pierce, was a Democrat, and every U.S. President since has been either a Democrat or a Republican.
Andrew Johnson Was the First President to Be Impeached
Andrew Johnson became President in 1865, during one of the most turbulent moments in American history. The Civil War had just ended, and the nation was still reeling from that violent conflict and the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. When Vice President Johnson took office following Lincoln’s death, his principal task was the reconstruction of the former Confederate states. President Johnson, a Democrat from Tennessee, was criticized by Republicans in Congress for being too lenient with former members of the Confederacy, and for vetoing legislation designed to protect the rights of newly freed Black Americans.
The escalating tensions between Johnson and the congressional Republicans reached a crisis point in 1868, when the President fired Edwin Stanton, his Republican secretary of war, without the required congressional approval. In response, the House of Representatives voted to impeach Johnson, marking the first time in U.S. history such an action had been taken against the President. Johnson narrowly escaped conviction by just one vote, but by the end of his first term, he found himself with few political allies in Washington, and was not elected to a second term.
Chester A. Arthur Earned the Approval of Mark Twain
Chester A. Arthur succeeded to the presidency following the death of President James Garfield in 1881. During Arthur’s one term in office, he advocated lower tariffs for businesses and tax cuts for American citizens. President Arthur also passed the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, which made some federal government jobs attainable only through merit-based examinations instead of through the “spoils system.” The “spoils system” allowed politicians to hire and fire civil servants based on their loyalty and political affiliations, and had frequently been denounced as a tool of political corruption. Through policies like these, Arthur managed to earn the praise of one of the sharpest and most unsparing satirists of his day, Mark Twain. Though Twain was noted for his pointed criticisms of many politicians, he claimed that it would be “hard to better President Arthur’s administration” — glowing praise indeed from a writer who once called President Teddy Roosevelt “the most formidable disaster that has befallen the country since the Civil War.”
Theodore Roosevelt Was the First President to Win a Nobel Peace Prize
Theodore Roosevelt was Vice President to William McKinley until President McKinley’s death in 1901. During his time in the White House, President Roosevelt became many things: a conservationist, a trust buster, and, in 1906, a Nobel Prize-winning peace negotiator. From 1904 to 1905, Japan and Russia were locked in the Russo-Japanese War over conflicting imperial ambitions in Manchuria and Korea. The war threatened to destabilize Asia and disrupt the balance of power in the Pacific, so Roosevelt decided to intervene to de-escalate the conflict. In August 1905, Roosevelt invited delegates from Japan and Russia to convene in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, for peace negotiations. The President presided over the peace talks for 30 days before the two warring countries ended the conflict by signing the Treaty of Portsmouth. For his role in brokering the peace, Roosevelt was awarded the 1906 Nobel Peace Prize, making him the first U.S. President to receive the honor.
Calvin Coolidge Was Administered the Oath of Office by His Own Father
After serving as Vice President from 1921 to 1923, Calvin Coolidge became President of the United States after Warren G. Harding passed away following a sudden illness. Coolidge was at his family home in Vermont when he learned that Harding had died and he needed to take the oath of office. While the oath is typically administered by the chief justice of the United States, Coolidge wound up going for someone less formal: his own father. As a notary public, Coolidge’s father, John Calvin Coolidge Sr., had the legal power to administer the oath. The modest inauguration ceremony was attended by just a handful of people, and since it was the middle of the night and the house had no electricity, the new President took his late-night oath by the flame of a kerosene lamp.
Harry Truman Had the First Televised Presidential Inauguration
Harry S. Truman had been Vice President for just 82 days when Franklin D. Roosevelt passed away in 1945. After completing his first presidential term, during which he oversaw the end of World War II, Truman ran for a second term (the first to which he would need to be elected) in 1948. In a famous upset, the incumbent President beat his Republican challenger Thomas E. Dewey. When it came time for Truman to take the oath of office, the event was a far cry from Calvin Coolidge’s candlelit affair. The inauguration ceremony was the first in history to be broadcast on television, and was watched by some 10 million viewers.
Lyndon B. Johnson Was Elected by the Widest-Ever Margin at the Time
Lyndon B. Johnson’s first presidential term began in 1963 under tragic circumstances following the death of President John F. Kennedy. During his time in office, Johnson laid out his “Great Society” platform, which included new social policies such as Medicare and numerous laws designed to alleviate poverty. In 1964, when it was time for Johnson to seek election to a second term, it quickly became clear that his first term had made a good impression. Johnson won the presidential race against Republican challenger Barry Goldwater by 15 million votes, the widest margin of any U.S. presidential election at the time. (Richard Nixon later won the 1972 election by nearly 18 million votes, and Ronald Reagan won reelection in 1984 by around 16.8 million votes.)
Gerald Ford Replaced a Resigning Vice President and a Resigning President
Though Gerald Ford served as President Richard Nixon’s Vice President from 1973 to 1974, he was never Nixon’s running mate. Ford was a leading Republican congressman when, in 1973, Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned amid a corruption scandal. To fill the vacancy left by Agnew’s resignation, President Nixon appointed Ford as his new VP. Ford’s tenure as Agnew’s replacement didn’t last long, however, because just one year later he became Nixon’s replacement. Following the events of the Watergate scandal, Nixon resigned the presidency in 1974, leaving Ford to take his place in the Oval Office. To this day, Ford remains the only person to serve as U.S. President without winning a general election as either a presidential or vice presidential candidate.
George H.W. Bush 43rd President
George H.W. Bush served for 8 years as the VP to Ronald R Reagan and subsequently served as President for one term Losing to Bill Clinton in 1992.
For centuries, getting around by horse and cart was the standard mode of transportation. By the 1800s, however, these hay-powered haulers were causing problems on busy city streets. As more people moved into cities, the number of horses dramatically increased, and with so many equines on the roads — New York City had around 150,000 horses in 1890 — public health concerns emerged over disease and mountains of manure. Horse travel, frankly put, was dirty in comparison to making way by horseless carriage, aka the first electric vehicles. Marketed as clean, quiet, and easy to drive, early electric cars, which resembled traditional carriages, became so popular that by 1900 they accounted for around one-third of all automotive vehicles on roadways.
The earliest known full-sized electric car was designed by Robert Anderson, a Scottish inventor who built his version in the 1830s, though that car (and many of its successors) didn’t go very far; at the time, batteries were rudimentary and couldn’t be recharged. It took about three decades for electric car batteries to improve, and starting in 1881, battery-operated busesbegan ferrying passengers in Paris, Berlin, London, and New York. A few years later, Iowa chemist William Morrison applied for a patent for his electric carriage, which could travel around 50 miles on one charge at a top speed of 20 miles per hour. By 1897, the top-selling car in the U.S. was powered by battery, though electric vehicles would hold the market for a relatively short time. By 1913, manufacturer Henry Ford had fine-tuned the mass production of gas-powered cars, dropping their price and helping to usher in a new era of private transportation.
We have a new Presidential candidate to support. The fact that she was the VP and has a certain reputation established is a good beginning. Who is to be her running mate, or do we know yet? There are some definite plusses in this change age and gender being at the top of the list. The nation needs younger people in the driver’s seat. The days of the old men hopefully are over. Age is supposed to come with wisdom, but often it does not. Take the current older person that wants to be re-elected. This has got to be screwing with the Trump game plan because they were going to keep on about Biden’s age and mental capacity Now his acid tongue and septic personality have to shift gears to address the new threat. Speaking of threats the Trump campaign was the target of a threat, a shooting that missed but it was an attempt. Now it seems that the followers of the great leader are upset because there have been comments about this event that were not supportive. The people that made those comments are using their 1st amendment right to express an opinion that the cult members find unacceptable. The cult now is tracking down these people and harassing them for not worshiping in the temple of Trump. The cult is pressuring the employers of these folks to fire them, and threats are being lodged against the person, the families and the employers of the person. All this effort to cause harm and to create discord needs to stop. Members of the cult have made bold statements about how the enemies of Trump could end up dead. Has anyone gone to the trouble of tracking that person’s information out and then having them fired from their jobs. If that has happened it has not made the news. Expressing an opinion is protected regardless of the comment. You are not to threaten people but an opinion of the outcome of an incident is hardly a threat. Back channeling to cause harm to anyone who stated an opinion should be treated as a threat and dealt with accordingly. Treat others as you would be treated. We all do not like the same things or people. We express either positive or negative opinions in a million different ways. If in this case the response is negative, remember that it is just an opinion and you are expressing yours by threatening (an illegal act) that person’s well being. Let’s hear it for the rule of law and start punishing the one breaking the law. Business leaders should take the stance that what an employee says regarding this incident has nothing to do with them. In the same breath they should say they protect the right of the person to state their opinion and that is the end of it. Our employee base has people that will vote for Trump and others that will not, we don’t ask nor hire or fire on the basis of race, religion, or political party and we are not going to be the scapegoat for anyone’s bias. The bully gets his way if you let him. This is the tactic that is being used and the media is reporting it. The people who are caring about this nonsense should be named as well as the person that made a negative comment, to be fair. Then we should go back to that person’s employer and see if they are going to dismiss that person for being loyal to the cult. Civility seems to be what is expected at this time, and yet, the request is now coming from the people who have shown zero civility since 2015 when their leader began his campaign for office. Decency, honor, civility and kindness are traits that have not been demonstrated by the cult so why does the cult expect to be given any of those things? Again you reap what you sew.
As with many historical myths, we can thank Hollywood for this particular misconception, as popular films helped perpetuate the image of horned-helmet-clad Vikings looting and pillaging their way across Europe. And yet the common depiction of these seafaring Scandinavian troublemakers goes back even further, to the initial staged performances of Richard Wagner’s Der Ring des Nibelungen operas in the late 19th century. In reality, the only extant helmet found in Scandinavia and confirmed to be from the Viking era, which covered the ninth through 11th centuries, has no protuberances. Two other horned helmets, unearthed from a bog in Denmark in 1942, have since been found to predate the Vikings by two millennia, and were more likely used for ceremonial purposes than for protection in combat.
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/archetype/UHRD3I66QRAL3AQMMUMT4OUSUI.jpg)
Esoteric Meandering Shouting Into the Void 
You must be logged in to post a comment.